演员韩烨否认自己导致赵丽英和冯绍峰分手
众所周知，赵丽颖工作室和冯绍峰工作室于4月23日同时宣布离婚。4月24日，冯绍峰通过工作室发表了一份法律声明，否认任何家庭暴力的传言。最近又有传闻称女演员韩烨也牵涉其中。
据新浪网报道，女演员韩烨发现自己被指责为“第三者”，一些人指责她将自己和冯的私密照发给赵丽颖，导致两人离婚。
韩烨在微博上写道:“发生了什么事?从没想过有一天我会跟踪自己的八卦。我只和他们俩合作过。我不知道这些谣言的制造者是谁。”这位女演员还呼吁网民们保持常识，并补充说如果此事继续下去，她可能不得不采取法律行动。
另一方面，冯绍峰也威胁要对那些制造或传播虚假新闻的人采取法律行动。
Han Ye denies that she plays a part that lead to the separation of Zhao Li Ying and Feng Shao Feng
As we all know, both Zhao Liying studio and Feng Shaofeng studio announced the divoice at the same time on April 23. Feng Shaofeng released a legal statement to deny the rumour of any family voilence on April 24 via his studio. Recently, there was another rumour broght actress Feng Ye in the case.
As reported on Sina, actress Han Ye found herself accused of being the third party, with some accusing her of sending intimate photos of her and Feng to Zhao Liying that led to the couple's divorce.
Han wrote on her Weibo, "What had happened? Never thought that one day I would be following my own gossips. I have only worked with the two of them. I don't know who are these people creating these rumours." The actress also pleaded for netizens' common sense, adding that she may have to take legal action if it continues.
On the other hand, Feng Shaofeng also threatened legal action against those who creat or spread the false news.

Here, we used isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) combined with mutagenesis and biochemical analysis to explore the binding of Na+/Li+ to wild type NhaA and NhaA variants purified in detergent micelles. We revealed the thermodynamics of Li+ binding to NhaA; the high specificity, stoichiometry (1Li+/NhaA), and drastic pH dependence of binding; and that Asp-163, Asp-164, Thr-132, and Asp-133 form the binding site, whereas Lys-300 plays a major role in the pH regulation of NhaA.

Therefore, the question arises whether the pH dependence of activity is a reflection of the pH dependence of the ligand binding to NhaA or a reaction following binding. To answer this question, we measured the pH dependence of Li+ binding to NhaA in different ITC reaction buffers with pH values of 6.5, 7.0, 7.5 (not shown), 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 (Fig. 4, A, C, and D). However, binding was observed only at pH 8.5 (Fig. 4A). These results imply that ligand binding to NhaA is extremely sensitive to pH.