2023CUDC校选赛指南(一)
目前,2023年#中国大学生英语辩论赛# (CUDC)校选赛正在进行中,全国总决赛将于11月举行。
大赛分为校选赛和全国总决赛。各高校自行开展校选赛,筛选出2名辩手,代表本校参加全国总决赛。具体安排如下:
01.报名条件
校选赛面向全国各地区高校开展。参赛辩手须为中国籍全日制在校本专科大学生、硕士研究生及博士研究生,指导老师须为该校在职教师。
02时间及比赛形式
20.23年5月至7月。各高校可根据校历自行决定校选赛时间,采用线上或线下的形式组织校选赛。
03.赛制
采取世界大学生英语辩论赛通用的英式议会制辩论(British Parliamentary Debate)。英式议会制辩论赛中,每轮比赛由四支队伍组成,依照持方分为正反两方,持方内按照发言顺序分为上下两院。(如图二)
比赛中,四支队伍相互独立,彼此竞争。四支队伍比赛结束后,裁判根据各队伍的表现对各队伍进行排名,各队伍获得相应积分,故同一持方上下两院队伍也互相竞争。
具体积分标准为:
排名-得分
1 - 3
2 - 2
3 - 1
4 - 0
每支队伍由2名辩手组成,整场比赛共8名辩手,每位辩手承担不同论证义务。(如图三)
8名辩手发言顺序为之字形,顺序为:PM-LO-DPM-DLO-MG-MO-GW-OW
比赛中,每位辩手有7分钟发言时间。辩手发言时,对方辩手可对该发言辩手提出质询(Point of Information, POI)。质询规则为:
1、发言辩手发言的首尾1分钟均为保护时间(Protected Time),质询在非保护时间的5分钟内发生;
2、每次质询不超过15秒;
3、质询包括在发言辩手7分钟发言时间内;
4、质询之间间隔时间为15秒。
目前,2023年#中国大学生英语辩论赛# (CUDC)校选赛正在进行中,全国总决赛将于11月举行。
大赛分为校选赛和全国总决赛。各高校自行开展校选赛,筛选出2名辩手,代表本校参加全国总决赛。具体安排如下:
01.报名条件
校选赛面向全国各地区高校开展。参赛辩手须为中国籍全日制在校本专科大学生、硕士研究生及博士研究生,指导老师须为该校在职教师。
02时间及比赛形式
20.23年5月至7月。各高校可根据校历自行决定校选赛时间,采用线上或线下的形式组织校选赛。
03.赛制
采取世界大学生英语辩论赛通用的英式议会制辩论(British Parliamentary Debate)。英式议会制辩论赛中,每轮比赛由四支队伍组成,依照持方分为正反两方,持方内按照发言顺序分为上下两院。(如图二)
比赛中,四支队伍相互独立,彼此竞争。四支队伍比赛结束后,裁判根据各队伍的表现对各队伍进行排名,各队伍获得相应积分,故同一持方上下两院队伍也互相竞争。
具体积分标准为:
排名-得分
1 - 3
2 - 2
3 - 1
4 - 0
每支队伍由2名辩手组成,整场比赛共8名辩手,每位辩手承担不同论证义务。(如图三)
8名辩手发言顺序为之字形,顺序为:PM-LO-DPM-DLO-MG-MO-GW-OW
比赛中,每位辩手有7分钟发言时间。辩手发言时,对方辩手可对该发言辩手提出质询(Point of Information, POI)。质询规则为:
1、发言辩手发言的首尾1分钟均为保护时间(Protected Time),质询在非保护时间的5分钟内发生;
2、每次质询不超过15秒;
3、质询包括在发言辩手7分钟发言时间内;
4、质询之间间隔时间为15秒。
智能驾驶7大龙头标的组合:
【经纬恒润】汽车电子丰富积累,MobilEye合作玩家
【德赛西威】智驾智舱双轮驱动,跨域融合产品发布
【伯特利】线控制动自主龙头地位初显,六条产线渐放量
【科博达】控制器转型域控,配套BYD、蔚来实现从0到1切换
【华阳集团】从智舱到智驾,跨域发展,融合推进
【保隆科技】智驾感知零部件逐步放量,空悬系统国内领先
【均胜电子】借被动安全Know-how,切入主动安全及智能驾驶赛道
【浙商I.D:Intelligent Driving】
【经纬恒润】汽车电子丰富积累,MobilEye合作玩家
【德赛西威】智驾智舱双轮驱动,跨域融合产品发布
【伯特利】线控制动自主龙头地位初显,六条产线渐放量
【科博达】控制器转型域控,配套BYD、蔚来实现从0到1切换
【华阳集团】从智舱到智驾,跨域发展,融合推进
【保隆科技】智驾感知零部件逐步放量,空悬系统国内领先
【均胜电子】借被动安全Know-how,切入主动安全及智能驾驶赛道
【浙商I.D:Intelligent Driving】
如果降落伞不出问题的概率是80%,
你愿意带着它跳伞吗?
#摘抄感悟#
巴菲特:“I prefer to structure investing as a no-called-strikes game and just wait for the fat one”,他希望把投资变成一个永不出局的游戏,永远等待那个非常确定的击球机会。
#今日摘抄#
Coke is now getting a royalty on swallows; probably 7.2 billion a day. If this average gulp is one ounce. I feel 100% sure (perhaps mistakenly) that I know the odds of this continuing-again 100% as long as cola doesn’t cause cancer. Bill has an even better royalty-one which I would never bet against but I don’t feel I am capable of assessing probabilities about, except to the extent that with a gun to my head and forced to make a guess, I would go with it rather than against. But to calibrate whether my certainty is 80% or 55%, say. For a 20-year run would be folly. if I had to make such decisions, I would do my best but I prefer to structure investing as a no-called-strikes game and just wait for the fat one. (可口可乐现在每天从每一口咽下去的饮料中获得版税,可能达到72亿美元。如果这个平均吞咽量是一盎司,我有 100% 的把握(也许是错误的)认为这种情况会持续下去——只要可乐不会引起癌症。比尔有一个更好的使用权,我永远不会打赌反对它,但我不认为自己能够对概率进行评估,除非在被逼无奈、被指着枪膛必须猜测的情况下,我会选择赞同它而不是反对它。但要衡量我的确信度是 80% 还是 55%,例如为期 20 年的周期,那就是愚蠢的。如果我必须做出这样的决定,我会尽力而为,但我更喜欢将投资变成永不出局的无风险游戏,并等待好的机会。)
I watched Ted Williams on cable the other day and he referred to a book called the science of hitting which I then ran down. It has a drawing of the batters box in it that he had referred to on the show with lots of little squares in it, all parts of the strike zone. In his favourites spot, the box showed .400 reflecting what he felt he would hit if he only swung at pitches in that area. Low and outsized, but still in the strike zone, he got down to .260. Of course, if he had two strikes on him, he was going to swing at that .260 pitch but otherwise he waited for one in the “happy zone” as he put it. I think the same approach makes sense in investing.(我之前有一天在电视上看到了泰德·威廉姆斯,他提到了一本书叫《打击科学》。我随后去查了一下这本书。书里有一个击球区的图画,他在节目中提到了它,上面有很多小方格,都是打击区域的一部分。在他最喜欢的位置上,方框里写着.400,反映了他认为如果他只击打那个区域的球,他将能够达到的击球率。如果球低而大,但仍在打击区内,他的击球率将下降至0.260。当然,如果他面临两个被投手投到一个区域的机会,他会击打那个0.260的球,但除此之外,他会等待一个“甜蜜区”的球。我认为这种方法在投资方面也是有意义的。)
Your happy zone, because of the business experience you have had, what you see every day, your natural talents, etc. is going to be different than mine. I am sure, moreover that you can hit balls better in my happy zone than l can in yours just because they are fatter pitches in general. (由于你拥有的商业经验、每天看到的事情、天生的才能等等,你的“甜蜜区域”会与我的不同。此外,我相信你在我的快乐区域中打球会比我在你的快乐区域中打得更好,只是因为一般来说它们是更好击打的球。)
#今日晨读#
你愿意带着它跳伞吗?
#摘抄感悟#
巴菲特:“I prefer to structure investing as a no-called-strikes game and just wait for the fat one”,他希望把投资变成一个永不出局的游戏,永远等待那个非常确定的击球机会。
#今日摘抄#
Coke is now getting a royalty on swallows; probably 7.2 billion a day. If this average gulp is one ounce. I feel 100% sure (perhaps mistakenly) that I know the odds of this continuing-again 100% as long as cola doesn’t cause cancer. Bill has an even better royalty-one which I would never bet against but I don’t feel I am capable of assessing probabilities about, except to the extent that with a gun to my head and forced to make a guess, I would go with it rather than against. But to calibrate whether my certainty is 80% or 55%, say. For a 20-year run would be folly. if I had to make such decisions, I would do my best but I prefer to structure investing as a no-called-strikes game and just wait for the fat one. (可口可乐现在每天从每一口咽下去的饮料中获得版税,可能达到72亿美元。如果这个平均吞咽量是一盎司,我有 100% 的把握(也许是错误的)认为这种情况会持续下去——只要可乐不会引起癌症。比尔有一个更好的使用权,我永远不会打赌反对它,但我不认为自己能够对概率进行评估,除非在被逼无奈、被指着枪膛必须猜测的情况下,我会选择赞同它而不是反对它。但要衡量我的确信度是 80% 还是 55%,例如为期 20 年的周期,那就是愚蠢的。如果我必须做出这样的决定,我会尽力而为,但我更喜欢将投资变成永不出局的无风险游戏,并等待好的机会。)
I watched Ted Williams on cable the other day and he referred to a book called the science of hitting which I then ran down. It has a drawing of the batters box in it that he had referred to on the show with lots of little squares in it, all parts of the strike zone. In his favourites spot, the box showed .400 reflecting what he felt he would hit if he only swung at pitches in that area. Low and outsized, but still in the strike zone, he got down to .260. Of course, if he had two strikes on him, he was going to swing at that .260 pitch but otherwise he waited for one in the “happy zone” as he put it. I think the same approach makes sense in investing.(我之前有一天在电视上看到了泰德·威廉姆斯,他提到了一本书叫《打击科学》。我随后去查了一下这本书。书里有一个击球区的图画,他在节目中提到了它,上面有很多小方格,都是打击区域的一部分。在他最喜欢的位置上,方框里写着.400,反映了他认为如果他只击打那个区域的球,他将能够达到的击球率。如果球低而大,但仍在打击区内,他的击球率将下降至0.260。当然,如果他面临两个被投手投到一个区域的机会,他会击打那个0.260的球,但除此之外,他会等待一个“甜蜜区”的球。我认为这种方法在投资方面也是有意义的。)
Your happy zone, because of the business experience you have had, what you see every day, your natural talents, etc. is going to be different than mine. I am sure, moreover that you can hit balls better in my happy zone than l can in yours just because they are fatter pitches in general. (由于你拥有的商业经验、每天看到的事情、天生的才能等等,你的“甜蜜区域”会与我的不同。此外,我相信你在我的快乐区域中打球会比我在你的快乐区域中打得更好,只是因为一般来说它们是更好击打的球。)
#今日晨读#
✋热门推荐