【M+戏院 | 周末精选 】
你可有兴趣透过电影以非人类的视角纵观天下？ 把握机会观赏"放眼世界，立足本土：生态电影选"放映节目，通过各种流动影像作品，探讨环境生态及可持续发展的世界性问题， 以不一样的角度观看世界。
《猪唛农庄》与《无题（面具）》| 27.5.2023（六）
母猪诞下一窝小猪，《猪唛农庄》的镜头全天候近距离观察它们的争吃 、嬉戏和成长。影片完全摒弃音乐、旁白和字幕，且始终不见人迹，看似实验的作法却别有一番纯电影的魔力。同场放映的《无题（面具）》引导观众把感受投射到面具遮盖的脸上，从而突显了人与动物两者意识的隔阂。 https://t.cn/A6p7dlqn
《人类世：谁主地球》| 28.5.2023（日）
人类活动对环境造成的巨大影响，足以引致大规模物种灭绝和气候变化。有些理论认为地球已经由“全新世”进入另一个地质年代──“人类世”。制作团队花上四年时间踏遍六大洲，走访二十个国家，以令人目瞪口呆的警世影像，反思人类的破坏力和支配欲，如何为人与地球的关系敲响了警钟。 https://t.cn/A6p7dlqE
图一：域陀高萨哥夫斯基《猪唛农庄》，2020，相片由Cinephil提供；图二：皮尔雨格《无题（面具）》，2014，相片由艺术家、Anna Lena Films、Hauser & Wirth提供；图三：珍妮花白丝华、爱德华布汀斯基、尼古拉斯德潘斯尔《人类世：谁主地球》，2018，相片由Les Films Seville Inc.提供。
#西九文化区##M+##M+博物馆##M+是不一样的博物馆#
你可有兴趣透过电影以非人类的视角纵观天下？ 把握机会观赏"放眼世界，立足本土：生态电影选"放映节目，通过各种流动影像作品，探讨环境生态及可持续发展的世界性问题， 以不一样的角度观看世界。
《猪唛农庄》与《无题（面具）》| 27.5.2023（六）
母猪诞下一窝小猪，《猪唛农庄》的镜头全天候近距离观察它们的争吃 、嬉戏和成长。影片完全摒弃音乐、旁白和字幕，且始终不见人迹，看似实验的作法却别有一番纯电影的魔力。同场放映的《无题（面具）》引导观众把感受投射到面具遮盖的脸上，从而突显了人与动物两者意识的隔阂。 https://t.cn/A6p7dlqn
《人类世：谁主地球》| 28.5.2023（日）
人类活动对环境造成的巨大影响，足以引致大规模物种灭绝和气候变化。有些理论认为地球已经由“全新世”进入另一个地质年代──“人类世”。制作团队花上四年时间踏遍六大洲，走访二十个国家，以令人目瞪口呆的警世影像，反思人类的破坏力和支配欲，如何为人与地球的关系敲响了警钟。 https://t.cn/A6p7dlqE
图一：域陀高萨哥夫斯基《猪唛农庄》，2020，相片由Cinephil提供；图二：皮尔雨格《无题（面具）》，2014，相片由艺术家、Anna Lena Films、Hauser & Wirth提供；图三：珍妮花白丝华、爱德华布汀斯基、尼古拉斯德潘斯尔《人类世：谁主地球》，2018，相片由Les Films Seville Inc.提供。
#西九文化区##M+##M+博物馆##M+是不一样的博物馆#
马来西亚票房（5/24）:货币(令吉)
《速度与激情10》19,740,698/21,933,876
《银河护卫队3》1,949,644/17,800,341
《倒数说我爱你》89,339/354,240
《长空之王》133,126/534,609
《别岁》1139,56/378,857
《龙马精神》37,645/8,645,456
《柯南：黑铁的神秘列车》34,089/94,436
《惊天救援》7,126/919,765
#人生路不熟#于2023年5月25日公映，由Mega Films负责发行，电影分级P12，提前场观影165人次，累计票房3,246令吉。
本周四上映的新片很多，华语片受影响不小，老片除了《长空之王》以及《倒数说我爱你》应该都没有什么余量了。
《速度与激情10》19,740,698/21,933,876
《银河护卫队3》1,949,644/17,800,341
《倒数说我爱你》89,339/354,240
《长空之王》133,126/534,609
《别岁》1139,56/378,857
《龙马精神》37,645/8,645,456
《柯南：黑铁的神秘列车》34,089/94,436
《惊天救援》7,126/919,765
#人生路不熟#于2023年5月25日公映，由Mega Films负责发行，电影分级P12，提前场观影165人次，累计票房3,246令吉。
本周四上映的新片很多，华语片受影响不小，老片除了《长空之王》以及《倒数说我爱你》应该都没有什么余量了。
找到了楊德昌談張震考學被拒那件事的原文, John Anderson「Contemporary Film Directors: Edward Yang」裡面楊德昌的採訪 (這本書裡震的名字羅馬化全部都用Zhang Zhen而不是CC, 難怪之前沒搜到[汗][允悲])
JA: Isn't it also amazing what peopel aren't familiar with? I hear stories from teachers of film school students who show up and don't know what Citizen Kane is. You get that kind of thing?
EY: The problem with the school I was teaching in--the name of the school was the National Academy of Fine Arts. I was in the theater department. All the students were accepted not just by the written exam, but they needed to go through auditions and stuff. The audition process began...began to suck. And the teachers' mentality began to change. Less and less liberal to more and more conservative. More and more conventional. So one time one of the kids who was in my movie, Zhang Zhen, had acted in films already--he was in Crouching Tiger, the fellow who plays the bandit who falls in love with Zhang Ziyi--he wasn't accepted, simply because they didn't want him. He has to be qualified, he's an experienced actor. So how can you turn down a qualified person like that?
JA: They turned him down on the basis of what?
EY: They probably thought that they couldn't control him, or impress him enough. But basically it was getting very conservative, conventional, and conformist.
JA: Isn't it also amazing what peopel aren't familiar with? I hear stories from teachers of film school students who show up and don't know what Citizen Kane is. You get that kind of thing?
EY: The problem with the school I was teaching in--the name of the school was the National Academy of Fine Arts. I was in the theater department. All the students were accepted not just by the written exam, but they needed to go through auditions and stuff. The audition process began...began to suck. And the teachers' mentality began to change. Less and less liberal to more and more conservative. More and more conventional. So one time one of the kids who was in my movie, Zhang Zhen, had acted in films already--he was in Crouching Tiger, the fellow who plays the bandit who falls in love with Zhang Ziyi--he wasn't accepted, simply because they didn't want him. He has to be qualified, he's an experienced actor. So how can you turn down a qualified person like that?
JA: They turned him down on the basis of what?
EY: They probably thought that they couldn't control him, or impress him enough. But basically it was getting very conservative, conventional, and conformist.
✋热门推荐