今天年28，观音堂每年正月26发平安符，当天工作日走不开，今天特意赶去，想不到被告知没了，一年只有26那一天派，明明去年我去还有很多剩的，不止派了一天，可见今年全面解封庙里真的是人山人海供不应求。不过还是领了花，糖果（大吉大利），最后庙里的阿伯还一边念着“健康平安”一边在脖颈背后敲了一个“观音佛祖”平安印，也是新体验了。
今天也是第一次留意观音堂旁边组屋的建筑风格，Cheng Yan Court ，造型和走廊外部的护栏是中式的，桔红色涂料。每次经过观音堂都由衷感叹，贴隔壁楼里的住户，能扛住，真不一般。
路过过年时排队汹涌的吉祥红龟粿，店里全是老婆婆现场手工制粿，买了一盒糯米饭还有6枚粿，盛惠13刀，想不到十分好味。
还首次尝试了冬阴功海鲜汤，也算成功。
路过AXA大厦，未来的阿里大楼，还在拆除中，正对着我同事家，这动土煞也还是多少有点影响，差不多和她的特斯拉股票同步了。
今天也是第一次留意观音堂旁边组屋的建筑风格，Cheng Yan Court ，造型和走廊外部的护栏是中式的，桔红色涂料。每次经过观音堂都由衷感叹，贴隔壁楼里的住户，能扛住，真不一般。
路过过年时排队汹涌的吉祥红龟粿，店里全是老婆婆现场手工制粿，买了一盒糯米饭还有6枚粿，盛惠13刀，想不到十分好味。
还首次尝试了冬阴功海鲜汤，也算成功。
路过AXA大厦，未来的阿里大楼，还在拆除中，正对着我同事家，这动土煞也还是多少有点影响，差不多和她的特斯拉股票同步了。
Balmain x PUMA「Balmain COURT」联乘合作篮球鞋款极限量登场，该鞋款由意大利手工制作，皮革搭配网眼构建鞋面，中部魔术贴彰显Balmain LOGO，而PUMA LOGO呈现于鞋舌末端，PUMA PROFOAM中底有助于着用者在赛场上更好地发挥，运动与奢华完美融合，据悉该鞋款现已正式开售，仅限量24双，一半登陆PUMA官网发售，一半于PUMA店铺发售。
#考研英语# 【每日一句】
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency. The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises. But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
思考题解析
（一）
思考题：
It can be inferred from the text that_____.
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
思考题解析：
It can be inferred from the text that _____
从文章中可以得知____
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
（ A ）法律上的胜利是对人权的侵犯
原文说了比利时政府违背气候原则才是对人权的侵犯。
所以A选项不对！
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(B) 政府的努力受到法官的赞扬
首先政府没努力
其次法官没有赞扬政府！
所以B不对！
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(C) 政府接受非政府组织的要求
政府没有接受非政府组织的要求
所以C不对！
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
(D)非政府组织的要求违反了制衡原则
正确！
对应最后一句：
this=NGO’s demand
the separation of powers= the check and balance
violate=breach 破坏！
长难句解析
（二）
长难句解析：
注释：黄色代表句子主干，红色代表定语，绿色代表状语，蓝色代表主干中较长的宾语从句，紫色代表同位语
第一句：
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency.
参考译文：布鲁塞尔一家法院裁定，比利时未能实现气候目标是对人权的侵犯；这是针对那些没能兑现应对环境危机承诺的政府当局的最新法律胜利。
第二句：
The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises.
参考译文：荷兰、德国和法国之前也做出过类似的裁决，这些国家的法官谴责政府应对气候危机不力或未能履行承诺。
第三句：
But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
参考译文：但法官们拒绝了该非政府组织提出的向政府施加新的、更严格的碳减排目标的要求，称这将违反权力的分立。
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency. The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises. But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
思考题解析
（一）
思考题：
It can be inferred from the text that_____.
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
思考题解析：
It can be inferred from the text that _____
从文章中可以得知____
(A) the legal victory is a violation of human rights
（ A ）法律上的胜利是对人权的侵犯
原文说了比利时政府违背气候原则才是对人权的侵犯。
所以A选项不对！
(B) the governments' effort is acclaimed by judges
(B) 政府的努力受到法官的赞扬
首先政府没努力
其次法官没有赞扬政府！
所以B不对！
(C) NGO’s demand is accepted by the governments
(C) 政府接受非政府组织的要求
政府没有接受非政府组织的要求
所以C不对！
(D) NGO’s demand violates the check and balance
(D)非政府组织的要求违反了制衡原则
正确！
对应最后一句：
this=NGO’s demand
the separation of powers= the check and balance
violate=breach 破坏！
长难句解析
（二）
长难句解析：
注释：黄色代表句子主干，红色代表定语，绿色代表状语，蓝色代表主干中较长的宾语从句，紫色代表同位语
第一句：
Belgium’s failure to meet climate targets is a violation of human rights, a Brussels court has ruled, in the latest legal victory against public authorities that have broken promises to tackle the climate emergency.
参考译文：布鲁塞尔一家法院裁定，比利时未能实现气候目标是对人权的侵犯；这是针对那些没能兑现应对环境危机承诺的政府当局的最新法律胜利。
第二句：
The legal victory follows similar rulings in the Netherlands, Germany and France, where judges have condemned governments for inadequate responses to the climate crisis or failing to keep their promises.
参考译文：荷兰、德国和法国之前也做出过类似的裁决，这些国家的法官谴责政府应对气候危机不力或未能履行承诺。
第三句：
But judges rejected the NGO’s demand that the courts should enforce tough new carbon-cutting targets on the state, saying this would breach the separation of powers.
参考译文：但法官们拒绝了该非政府组织提出的向政府施加新的、更严格的碳减排目标的要求，称这将违反权力的分立。
✋热门推荐