#翻译# #catti# 每日译词 | “转瞬即逝”，如何翻译？
[微笑] transient /ˈtræn.zi.ənt /
短暂的，转瞬即逝的；暂时的
释义：
lasting for only a short time; temporary
短暂的，转瞬即逝的；暂时的
例句1：
A glass of whisky has only a transient warming effect.
一杯威士忌只能使人暖和一会儿。
例句2：
The city has a large transient population (= many people who are living in it only temporarily).
这个城市有大量的暂住人口。
（来源：Cambridge Dictionary）
[微笑] transient /ˈtræn.zi.ənt /
短暂的，转瞬即逝的；暂时的
释义：
lasting for only a short time; temporary
短暂的，转瞬即逝的；暂时的
例句1：
A glass of whisky has only a transient warming effect.
一杯威士忌只能使人暖和一会儿。
例句2：
The city has a large transient population (= many people who are living in it only temporarily).
这个城市有大量的暂住人口。
（来源：Cambridge Dictionary）
#乐动一下# 吃糖无罪，适量万岁！
健康焦虑下，「糖」从甜蜜代表变成了全民公敌。甚至有人激励鼓吹「断糖饮食」。但是抗糖/控糖/断糖，你真的能分清楚吗？一起来听听营养专家怎么说。
01 抗糖有道理，重点在自律
抗糖，其实是抗糖化。抗的不是糖， 而是晚期糖化终产物(AGEs)。
AGEs是糖过量导致蛋白质变性的小恶魔，它会加速衰老，让皮肤变得暗黄，更严重甚至会诱发糖尿病、心血管疾病和癌症。所以抗糖并不是完全不吃糖，而是防止糖过量。
此外，抗糖更多地作为一种生活方式，日常生活中需要注意：
1.小心游离糖的过量摄入；
2.减少高GI食物带来的血糖波动；
3.少吃炸物、烧烤以减少AGEs摄入；
4.通过规律运动帮助稳定血糖。
抗糖化划重点：
减少体内AGEs产生
促进降解已生成的AGEs
减少外来的AGEs摄入
02 控糖有妙招，学会看配料
高糖已经成为青少年肥胖以及糖尿病高发的重要因素，但合理的做法是只减少添加糖、游离糖的摄入，比如黑糖奶茶、糖炒栗子、红糖姜茶等等。
隐藏得最深的可能是各种含糖饮料，500ml的饮料可能就摄入了25~70g糖，远超中国及WHO建议的每日糖摄入量25g以下的要求。
除了甜味零食和饮料，咸味零食和调味品也有添加糖，这就需要睁大你的小眼睛去看看配料表了。包装上有0糖、低糖之类的字样，也可以作为控糖的优先选择哦～
内容来源：薄荷健康
健康焦虑下，「糖」从甜蜜代表变成了全民公敌。甚至有人激励鼓吹「断糖饮食」。但是抗糖/控糖/断糖，你真的能分清楚吗？一起来听听营养专家怎么说。
01 抗糖有道理，重点在自律
抗糖，其实是抗糖化。抗的不是糖， 而是晚期糖化终产物(AGEs)。
AGEs是糖过量导致蛋白质变性的小恶魔，它会加速衰老，让皮肤变得暗黄，更严重甚至会诱发糖尿病、心血管疾病和癌症。所以抗糖并不是完全不吃糖，而是防止糖过量。
此外，抗糖更多地作为一种生活方式，日常生活中需要注意：
1.小心游离糖的过量摄入；
2.减少高GI食物带来的血糖波动；
3.少吃炸物、烧烤以减少AGEs摄入；
4.通过规律运动帮助稳定血糖。
抗糖化划重点：
减少体内AGEs产生
促进降解已生成的AGEs
减少外来的AGEs摄入
02 控糖有妙招，学会看配料
高糖已经成为青少年肥胖以及糖尿病高发的重要因素，但合理的做法是只减少添加糖、游离糖的摄入，比如黑糖奶茶、糖炒栗子、红糖姜茶等等。
隐藏得最深的可能是各种含糖饮料，500ml的饮料可能就摄入了25~70g糖，远超中国及WHO建议的每日糖摄入量25g以下的要求。
除了甜味零食和饮料，咸味零食和调味品也有添加糖，这就需要睁大你的小眼睛去看看配料表了。包装上有0糖、低糖之类的字样，也可以作为控糖的优先选择哦～
内容来源：薄荷健康
"At a time when the rising popularity of print made dissemination of new cultural ideas possible, while rising incomes and liberal attitudes created a generation of men behaving badly."
On a December night in 1629, Otto Copes and two friends were completely drunk. The 18-year old law student at the University of Groningen was 120 miles away from the watchful eye of his uncle, a magistrate in Hertogenbosch, a city in the generality lands of the Dutch Republic. Earlier in the day, he and two friends had been seen drinking in a tavern. However, by nightfall, their student merrymaking had turned into an orgy of binge drinking and violent aggression. Their noisiness attracted the attention of the city’s municipal guard who tried to temper their high- spiritedness. After mustering up enough courage and bravado from drinking, the three young men, armed with pistols, opened fire on the guard.
Today, a drunken armed young man roaming the streets late at night would be a recipe for disaster. Contemporary authorities would impose curfews, prohibit the sale of alcohol to minors, and there would be fingerpointing at parents and schools for raising maladjusted youngsters. Politicians and moralists would use the opportunity to unleash a wave of moral panic and predict the collision course ‘the youth of today are headed for. Moreover, tax money would be spent on expensive programs to reform young people.
In the seventeenth century, the authorities in Groningen were not alarmed by the aggressive behavior of Otto Copes and his friends, nor was there much cause for moral panic in similar cases throughout the Dutch Republic in the early seventeenth century, which raises the question:
Were excessive drinking and aggressive behavior typical for young men in the early modern period? Was it common for young men in the seventeenth century, or was this behavior specific to young men of Otto Copes’s generation who grew up during the 1620s and 1630s?
That brings us to the first dilemma in the history of youth. Historians in general have a tendency to address history in broad sweeping strokes such as ‘childhood and youth in the Middle Ages and early modern period’ or ‘youths in the seventeenth century’. However, we also often forget that a century in the past consisted of the same hundred years as our present era. It would be disrespectful to our ancestors to presume that change did not occur just as rapidly as it does today.
Cover illustration: Willem Buytewech, detail of Merry Company (c. 1620-1622) Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest
318p 2012
Amsterdam University Press
https://t.cn/A6KTlscJ
On a December night in 1629, Otto Copes and two friends were completely drunk. The 18-year old law student at the University of Groningen was 120 miles away from the watchful eye of his uncle, a magistrate in Hertogenbosch, a city in the generality lands of the Dutch Republic. Earlier in the day, he and two friends had been seen drinking in a tavern. However, by nightfall, their student merrymaking had turned into an orgy of binge drinking and violent aggression. Their noisiness attracted the attention of the city’s municipal guard who tried to temper their high- spiritedness. After mustering up enough courage and bravado from drinking, the three young men, armed with pistols, opened fire on the guard.
Today, a drunken armed young man roaming the streets late at night would be a recipe for disaster. Contemporary authorities would impose curfews, prohibit the sale of alcohol to minors, and there would be fingerpointing at parents and schools for raising maladjusted youngsters. Politicians and moralists would use the opportunity to unleash a wave of moral panic and predict the collision course ‘the youth of today are headed for. Moreover, tax money would be spent on expensive programs to reform young people.
In the seventeenth century, the authorities in Groningen were not alarmed by the aggressive behavior of Otto Copes and his friends, nor was there much cause for moral panic in similar cases throughout the Dutch Republic in the early seventeenth century, which raises the question:
Were excessive drinking and aggressive behavior typical for young men in the early modern period? Was it common for young men in the seventeenth century, or was this behavior specific to young men of Otto Copes’s generation who grew up during the 1620s and 1630s?
That brings us to the first dilemma in the history of youth. Historians in general have a tendency to address history in broad sweeping strokes such as ‘childhood and youth in the Middle Ages and early modern period’ or ‘youths in the seventeenth century’. However, we also often forget that a century in the past consisted of the same hundred years as our present era. It would be disrespectful to our ancestors to presume that change did not occur just as rapidly as it does today.
Cover illustration: Willem Buytewech, detail of Merry Company (c. 1620-1622) Museum of Fine Arts, Budapest
318p 2012
Amsterdam University Press
https://t.cn/A6KTlscJ
✋热门推荐